---

QuantSchool: Avoiding over-optimization

The Perils of Curve-Fitting

While QuantWave provides robust forecasts, improper customization can lead to dangerous over-optimization that fails in live markets.

Key Warning Signs

1. Excessive Parameter Tweaking

• Adjusting multiple forecast parameters simultaneously
• Chasing perfect historical fit
• Creating "unicorn" strategies that work only in backtests

2. Data-Mining Bias

Symptom	Healthy Alternative
Testing 50+ parameter combinations	Test 2-3 logical variations
Ignoring out-of-sample data	Always reserve 30% data for validation

QuantWave's Anti-Optimization Features

1. Robust Forecast Design

• Probabilistic rather than binary outputs
• Multiple scenario modeling
• Built-in uncertainty ranges

2. Optimization Safeguards

• Parameter change impact warnings
• Walk-forward testing tools
• Monte Carlo simulation

Practical Implementation Guidelines

The 5-Parameter Rule

1. Select core strategy first
2. Choose maximum 5 parameters to adjust
3. Modify in logical increments
4. Verify across market regimes
5. Lock parameters for 3-month minimum

Performance Evaluation Framework

Healthy Optimization Check

• Win rate between 55-75%
• Profit factor 1.5-3.0
• Drawdowns < 25%
• Consistent across time periods

Danger Zone Indicators

• Win rate > 85% in testing
• Sharpe ratio > 4
• Perfect equity curves
• Extreme parameter values

Common Optimization Traps

• Fitting to specific news events
• Over-adapting to recent volatility
• Creating too many exception rules
• Ignoring transaction costs

QuantWave forecasts are designed to work across market conditions without excessive tuning. By resisting the temptation to over-optimize and following these disciplined guidelines, you'll maintain robust performance in live trading environments.